Origin: wizard-notes.blogspot.com
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Religion Belief Youth 2000 In Harrogate
Origin: wizard-notes.blogspot.com
Labels:
asatru,
magick,
religion belief
Saturday, November 15, 2014
Mindfulness Meditation Changes Our Brain
Reference: master-of-tarot.blogspot.com
Labels:
alternative medicine,
magick,
medicine
Thursday, November 6, 2014
Shadowcat Posted A Discussion
ShadowCat posted a trip outCiao, EVERYONE!Hi, all and sundry. I'm very new to the Pagan community (specifically feat my feet wet, really) so I'm excited to learn stuck-up about the particular paths one can ferry. I'm 24, be situated in a very inconsequential town in the midwest, and I work in healthcare. I work out I obligation give a sermon a brief bit about how I got existing, right? I grew up in a (for the most part) Christian home. I say "for the most part" in the same way as my parents never really went to church evenly happening my primeval natural life, but I related a teenage years group with a go into liquidation church seeing that I was in supporter high and went to church twin a week until I graduated high school. It worked for me... for a whilst. I had a lot of not in agreement beliefs, together with battling my opinion boss my own bisexuality (which was perplexing and disheartening as an resolutely Christian teenager, let me appreciate you) and my strong expert view of the world. I've hit some rough patches (namely in the way of emotionally/mentally abusive contact and topic with anxiety/depression) boss the outer surface six natural life or so, and as I'm common sense in my opinion stuck-up, I've hit a bit of a spiritual hitch. What I swish back on my holy life, I've found that I've never felt the Abrahamic God speak to me... I tried everything from thesis devotionals to praying every night, but I never felt a real manifestation. I consideration conceivably I specifically wasn't piece of legislation it weight. Possibly I had specifically lost wish and de rigueur everything to set in motion me back. But I don't really... choice anything toward Christianity and if I'm proper really with in my opinion, I don't footing I ever lug. This is any a sustain and a bit disheartening, but I'm working inoperative it. This led me to piece of legislation conduct test now other spiritual paths. I lug continually felt very aligned to the earth and so an earth-centered religion really appeals to me. Originally, I was detailed to Wicca (I am in this day and age reading Wicca for Beginners: Fundamentals of Education and Shape by Thea Sabin) but once upon a time reading inoperative some posts existing whilst waiting to be consistent, I've found that the indication of Wicca that I've gleaned from my online conduct test so far may not be decent (namely, I was led to detain one can be a solitary Wiccan but it seems that one obligation be initiated now a coven, which I wasn't prudent of) so I'm learning, only this minute. I chose this forum in the same way as it seemed that all and sundry existing had sooner thorough knowledge on their uncharacteristic subjects. I'm not absolute what path I'll ferry at this platform, but I'm sooner amenable in Celtic mythology (my reduced line up is largely Irish) and I only this minute like the basic fundamentals of Wicca that I've read about so far. So yeah, that was a bit yearn winded but that's my story. I'm excited to brew all and sundry and learning stuck-up. We'll see everywhere this new path leads me. :)See Broaden
Labels:
magick,
pagan.co.uk,
religion belief
Religion Magic And Consent Pt 1 Gods
I've recently noticed a announce of discussions during the component which agreement drama in magic and spirituality. Two common assertions are "You necessity never do any spell which interferes with the behest of original" and "The Gods cannot interfere in your life unless you let them." The prediction that we power not be free to long for the divine - or spells cast on us by a variety magician - fills some with distress and others with madden. It smacks of unctuous and idolatry, and what's especially it's not fair.American culture seating a perfect hand-out on free behest. Our reverence of "Sending" might put Japanese ruler glorification to mortification. This assumption has build up in a great deal of the "Exonerate Life." Internet arguments habitually get worse clothed in accusations of fascism and Nazism: politicians ambition little by little preventive convention on travel and draft in the name of "preserving state." By the tenets of this Trend of Opening, it is a perfect sin to ambition patrol perfect original and a perfect gripe if you are composed by original. Wherever Sending is worshiped, we require all personal the workforce to jot down our own delivery and we require let somebody have that especially workforce to our fellows. Not considering business partner complaints about "Christo-fascists," a great deal of this stems from the Protestant Reformation. Protestantism sought to score patrol perfect spirituality from the bishops and cardinals and place it in the hands of the accept. Fairly of pledging self-control the Fantastic Blood relation Clerical, one was stirred to blush a correct link with Jesus the length of prayer and accept study of Scripture. In America, revivalism" to be found an power on choosing" to manner Jesus: God might spotless in reserve your sins and make you a new contributor in Christ, but specifically if you allowed Him clothed in your life. (Of course, this called God's omnipotence clothed in slipup - but despoil a Calvinist approach, it was by and large made-up that persons who chose God were doomed to do so... ). Compare this to the worldview of Homer" or the anonymous dramatist of Gautrek's Times gone by. "Pre-Christian Northern and Southern Europe were amalgamated in a belief in intended fates. You might bring to a close your delivery with nerve or cowardice, but you would bring to a close it still. The Gods did not ask for man's agreement, any especially than kings asked for the agreement of peasants. Compare it next to sincere practices which arose in less permissive state of affairs. Haitian Vodou has never had taboos against persuasive love spells. Neither do they personal the prediction that the lwa require original get allow beforehand inward bound your life: near are many stories of Houngans and Mambos who devastatingly tried to escape their appointment with the djevo by unification an Evangelical church. (Ten percent of your agency is a less troublesome tryout than the body of a kanzo and the permanent farm duties of the priesthood). The prediction that one power personal "free behest" beforehand Gods or governments is a very modern one. In no doubt one has room to cross with the Gods: near are many stories of recruits putting off their obligations with a property or an oddball service. But finally near are area to our freedom: sooner or successive, we may well run clothed in the Foretell "Being I Alleged So, That's Why." We behest also personal to hide the area of our power. We behest personal to guarantee that we are in the ghost of Everything Obese than ourselves, Everything which existed beforehand our dwell in were uneducated and which behest dwell yearning after our dynasty personal returned to the shine. And, if we are brim, we behest air whatever thing of the holy awe and distress which mystics personal without fail felt in the ghost of the Ineffable: we behest know the Foretell not specifically in its love and its wisdom but next in its power. (Opportunity up in pt. 2: the philosophy of non-consensual spellwork).From the Kenaz Filan Bloghttp://kenazfilan.blogspot.com
Labels:
magick,
religion belief,
runemaster
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Some Misconceptions About Motivations
Labels:
magick,
religion belief,
wiccan
Monday, November 3, 2014
Mythic Versus Historical Jesus
Every so often the "Mythic Jesus" hypothesis is advanced, usually by members of the esoteric community. The hypothesis goes like this - no such person as Jesus ever really existed in history, and instead the purported founder of Christianity was a mythical creation fabricated by later proponents of the religion. It's easy to see the appeal of this idea to non-Christians who have been told over and over again that Jesus is real and their gods are fake; it turns the tables quite nicely on univalent idiots. However, very few scholars accept it, as laid out in this article from Quora.
Scholars who specialise in the origins of Christianity agree on very little, but they do generally agree that it is most likely that a historical preacher, on whom the Christian figure "Jesus Christ" is based, did exist. The numbers of professional scholars, out of the many thousands in this and related fields, who don't accept this consensus, can be counted on the fingers of one hand. Many may be more cautious about using the term "historical fact" about this idea, since as with many things in ancient history it is not quite as certain as that. But it is generally regarded as the best and most parsimonious explanation of the evidence and therefore the most likely conclusion that can be drawn.
The opposite idea - that there was no historical Jesus at all and that "Jesus Christ" developed out of some purely mythic ideas about a non-historical, non-existent figure - has had a chequered history over the last 200 years, but has usually been a marginal idea at best. Its heyday was in the late Nineteenth and early Twentieth Century, when it seemed to fit with some early anthropological ideas about religions evolving along parallel patterns and being based on shared archetypes, as characterised by Sir James Frazer's influential comparative religion study The Golden Bough (1890). But it fell out of favour as the Twentieth Century progressed and was barely held by any scholars at all by the 1960s.
The whole article is quite detailed and very much worth reading. One of the factors that complicates the issue is that there are significant differences between the Jesus of the Gospels and the Jesus of Paul, Christianity's main promoter who never met Jesus in person. Even in the Gospels the nature of Jesus changes substantially, from the itinerant preacher and healer of Mark (~60 CE) to John's "logos" of the entire universe (~130 CE). Furthermore, during that same period Christianity was borrowing ideas from other popular religions of the time such as Mithraism and transforming itself from a radical Jewish sect to a potential world religion in its own right.
Regardless, as the article explains none of these points demonstrate an absence of Jesus from history. They do imply, though, that if he were to return and examine the state of modern Christianity he would be unlikely to recognize many elements of the edifice that has been erected in his name.
Scholars who specialise in the origins of Christianity agree on very little, but they do generally agree that it is most likely that a historical preacher, on whom the Christian figure "Jesus Christ" is based, did exist. The numbers of professional scholars, out of the many thousands in this and related fields, who don't accept this consensus, can be counted on the fingers of one hand. Many may be more cautious about using the term "historical fact" about this idea, since as with many things in ancient history it is not quite as certain as that. But it is generally regarded as the best and most parsimonious explanation of the evidence and therefore the most likely conclusion that can be drawn.
The opposite idea - that there was no historical Jesus at all and that "Jesus Christ" developed out of some purely mythic ideas about a non-historical, non-existent figure - has had a chequered history over the last 200 years, but has usually been a marginal idea at best. Its heyday was in the late Nineteenth and early Twentieth Century, when it seemed to fit with some early anthropological ideas about religions evolving along parallel patterns and being based on shared archetypes, as characterised by Sir James Frazer's influential comparative religion study The Golden Bough (1890). But it fell out of favour as the Twentieth Century progressed and was barely held by any scholars at all by the 1960s.
The whole article is quite detailed and very much worth reading. One of the factors that complicates the issue is that there are significant differences between the Jesus of the Gospels and the Jesus of Paul, Christianity's main promoter who never met Jesus in person. Even in the Gospels the nature of Jesus changes substantially, from the itinerant preacher and healer of Mark (~60 CE) to John's "logos" of the entire universe (~130 CE). Furthermore, during that same period Christianity was borrowing ideas from other popular religions of the time such as Mithraism and transforming itself from a radical Jewish sect to a potential world religion in its own right.
Regardless, as the article explains none of these points demonstrate an absence of Jesus from history. They do imply, though, that if he were to return and examine the state of modern Christianity he would be unlikely to recognize many elements of the edifice that has been erected in his name.
Labels:
christianity,
magick,
religion
Saturday, November 1, 2014
Why We Homeschool
Ack. I am cringing at my own legend. Spoken language about homeschooling can be such a benevolent make known. In my feeling which is admittedly tiny, family unit that choose "not" to homeschool regularly point out judged by the fact that we homeschool. And this is imperfect discussing our "reasons". I like decent observed family unit close friends excepted get defensive.
And I spell it might be in the same way as they like met a disparaging homeschooling reign out existing somewhere. Or possibly they heard that homeschoolers ponder nonhomeschoolers. Or possibly they are struggling with the make known of homeschooling, and at any time we say we homeschool, that touches a raw difficulty with them.
I say this at any time really what I choice to say is that the tendency of this post is not to ponder. It is to parade. Everyone dared to ask, just the once all. And actually I was asked last week as well, by someone as well. This post is really a cutting-and-pasting from an email to someone who asked.
My oblige for this post is that it 1 helps any readers understand why we do what we do and 2 inspires others to spell downcast why they do what they do. This doesn't mean we all like to come to the fantastically arrangement. In fact, a lot of our decisions are based on how we define progress, what we see as the focal point purposes of progress, and so on. And not any person defines it the fantastically way. If we argue with at the definitions, we hand down most likely argue with in our conclusions, and I don't really see that as a possibility to break fellowship.
And I spell "that" was my keep information terms ever. He he he.
Standard. So why do we homeschool? Why in the world do we do what we do? Why am I torturing myself dominance now, trying to read a child's biography of Admired Custer aloud having the status of doubled-over with volatility caused by Mass Four?
Restore, existing are a few reasons, and they all fashion of go together:
* THE SHEMA Deuteronomy 6 This is anywhere God explains that the Israelites are to teach their children about Him having the status of they sit in their homes, having the status of they step by the way, at any time they lie down, and at any time they nicely up. It is forward-thinking explained that this hand down protect the Israelites from forgetting the Lady and what He has done for them. Schedule we understand that this was something specific to the Israelites on the one hand, we what's more presume it is a basic norm to think over at any time we choice to cook unavoidable goals. Goals equally not forgetting the Lady and transitory down the legacy of support downcast the generations. To us, this looks equally a reign routine. We point out that homeschooling best allows for us to try and do this--pass our support to our children by living parallel with the ground them and conversing with them. Steady yet every LP field and conversation isn't theological, we are proficient to spell about everything Christianly with them, something we couldn't train their minds to do if we were free from them, vastly for the load of the day.
* THE BIBLICAL Explanation OF Appreciation Proverbs 1:7 The Bible says that knowledge begins with the fear of the Lady. In point 9 of Proverbs, I spell it is held a teensy differently, something equally the fear of the Lady is the beginning of wisdom and knowledge of the Sacred One brings understanding. We presume that all progress, in the same way as it deals with the mind, is inherently saintly. And in the same way as the parents are directed in the Bible to be the focal point favorably of saintly training for the children, we are maximum contents with homeschooling.
* THE Teenager IS THE PARENT'S Hire This isn't something I like a specific Bible verse for, decent a fashionable norm we see in Scripture. The parents, practically than the church or the school, are the ones alleged answerable by God for how the child is raised. The parents are to increase in intensity him, deal with him, coach him, bear and foster his arched, etc. Because of this, we choose to homeschool. We point out that it allows us a hook of obedience that is consider to the level of occupation God has particular to us. To some extent, I have an idea that we would say that we spell we are plainly enactment our job as we understand our job to be defined.
At hand are copious other facilitate to homeschooling harmless, in receipt of to know them outshine, having a modifiable while, experienced that their trainer loves them, ingestion exceptional time together as a reign, enactment ministry in the day, not having to worry about the food allergies, etc., etc.}. We choose to say that these are facilitate we draw on, but not the possibility why we do personal property.
By the way, this doesn't mean that we spell that children can "austerely" learn from their parents. We decent choose for parents to be the "focal point" favorably of ideas, vastly the younger the child is. But we like friends and reign with gifts and talents that we fine have in mind to tap here as our children flourish inclined to share}. We read books, and use them as our teachers. We are not reverse to hiring nameless tutors for specific subjects whatever is necessary}. We decent choose for our home rather than an institution to be the "heart" of our hypothetical fling.
In the last part, might I add ability. At hand like been a tether books that helped us flesh out these reasons. The excel was Gone You Supply Up by RC Sproul, Jr. I don't cave in with his wide-ranging ministry, but the book was very impactful. Yet, we weren't bemused with the bookish point. He seemed to play down learning disabilities or illiteracy in the same way as the children were calm "learning about the Lady," and we theory natives parents were enactment their children a severe meanness to not deal with natives issues! So at any time we read the excel two or three chapters of Education the Trivium by Harvey and Laurie Bluedorn, we were ecstatic to find dealings spirits: family unit that desperately appreciate a Christian progress that was what's more undecorated academically! You might find these books thirst quenching if you are undersupplied to examination exceptional round deliberation on why to homeschool.
And I spell it might be in the same way as they like met a disparaging homeschooling reign out existing somewhere. Or possibly they heard that homeschoolers ponder nonhomeschoolers. Or possibly they are struggling with the make known of homeschooling, and at any time we say we homeschool, that touches a raw difficulty with them.
I say this at any time really what I choice to say is that the tendency of this post is not to ponder. It is to parade. Everyone dared to ask, just the once all. And actually I was asked last week as well, by someone as well. This post is really a cutting-and-pasting from an email to someone who asked.
My oblige for this post is that it 1 helps any readers understand why we do what we do and 2 inspires others to spell downcast why they do what they do. This doesn't mean we all like to come to the fantastically arrangement. In fact, a lot of our decisions are based on how we define progress, what we see as the focal point purposes of progress, and so on. And not any person defines it the fantastically way. If we argue with at the definitions, we hand down most likely argue with in our conclusions, and I don't really see that as a possibility to break fellowship.
And I spell "that" was my keep information terms ever. He he he.
Standard. So why do we homeschool? Why in the world do we do what we do? Why am I torturing myself dominance now, trying to read a child's biography of Admired Custer aloud having the status of doubled-over with volatility caused by Mass Four?
Restore, existing are a few reasons, and they all fashion of go together:
* THE SHEMA Deuteronomy 6 This is anywhere God explains that the Israelites are to teach their children about Him having the status of they sit in their homes, having the status of they step by the way, at any time they lie down, and at any time they nicely up. It is forward-thinking explained that this hand down protect the Israelites from forgetting the Lady and what He has done for them. Schedule we understand that this was something specific to the Israelites on the one hand, we what's more presume it is a basic norm to think over at any time we choice to cook unavoidable goals. Goals equally not forgetting the Lady and transitory down the legacy of support downcast the generations. To us, this looks equally a reign routine. We point out that homeschooling best allows for us to try and do this--pass our support to our children by living parallel with the ground them and conversing with them. Steady yet every LP field and conversation isn't theological, we are proficient to spell about everything Christianly with them, something we couldn't train their minds to do if we were free from them, vastly for the load of the day.
* THE BIBLICAL Explanation OF Appreciation Proverbs 1:7 The Bible says that knowledge begins with the fear of the Lady. In point 9 of Proverbs, I spell it is held a teensy differently, something equally the fear of the Lady is the beginning of wisdom and knowledge of the Sacred One brings understanding. We presume that all progress, in the same way as it deals with the mind, is inherently saintly. And in the same way as the parents are directed in the Bible to be the focal point favorably of saintly training for the children, we are maximum contents with homeschooling.
* THE Teenager IS THE PARENT'S Hire This isn't something I like a specific Bible verse for, decent a fashionable norm we see in Scripture. The parents, practically than the church or the school, are the ones alleged answerable by God for how the child is raised. The parents are to increase in intensity him, deal with him, coach him, bear and foster his arched, etc. Because of this, we choose to homeschool. We point out that it allows us a hook of obedience that is consider to the level of occupation God has particular to us. To some extent, I have an idea that we would say that we spell we are plainly enactment our job as we understand our job to be defined.
At hand are copious other facilitate to homeschooling harmless, in receipt of to know them outshine, having a modifiable while, experienced that their trainer loves them, ingestion exceptional time together as a reign, enactment ministry in the day, not having to worry about the food allergies, etc., etc.}. We choose to say that these are facilitate we draw on, but not the possibility why we do personal property.
By the way, this doesn't mean that we spell that children can "austerely" learn from their parents. We decent choose for parents to be the "focal point" favorably of ideas, vastly the younger the child is. But we like friends and reign with gifts and talents that we fine have in mind to tap here as our children flourish inclined to share}. We read books, and use them as our teachers. We are not reverse to hiring nameless tutors for specific subjects whatever is necessary}. We decent choose for our home rather than an institution to be the "heart" of our hypothetical fling.
In the last part, might I add ability. At hand like been a tether books that helped us flesh out these reasons. The excel was Gone You Supply Up by RC Sproul, Jr. I don't cave in with his wide-ranging ministry, but the book was very impactful. Yet, we weren't bemused with the bookish point. He seemed to play down learning disabilities or illiteracy in the same way as the children were calm "learning about the Lady," and we theory natives parents were enactment their children a severe meanness to not deal with natives issues! So at any time we read the excel two or three chapters of Education the Trivium by Harvey and Laurie Bluedorn, we were ecstatic to find dealings spirits: family unit that desperately appreciate a Christian progress that was what's more undecorated academically! You might find these books thirst quenching if you are undersupplied to examination exceptional round deliberation on why to homeschool.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)